Zoek binnen de website

News & Insights van Lindenbaum

Lindenbaum is een litigationkantoor. Wij focussen op waar wij het beste in zijn: geschilbeslechting. Wij dwingen de rechten van bedrijven en consumenten strategisch af met daadkrachtige actie.

lindenbaum2023_a_court_case_against_the_company_Apple_with_th_00ea4ec5-315c-4c93-a125-0b3d9aebe55a_0

ECJ endorses a flexible definition of ‘place where damage occurred’ for jurisdiction in collective actions in digital markets: Stichting v Apple

Insights 9 december 2025

The long-anticipated Stichting v Apple case provides important clarifications on questions of jurisdiction in collective actions.

Lees meer
Zandloper

Recent case-law on undue payment claims

Insights 3 november 2025

Our colleague Bouchra Boulouize has written a case note for JIN on the recent Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) judgment in SnowWorld, on claims based on undue payments.

Lees meer
lindenbaum2023_exhaust_gas_recirculation_volkswagen_black_smo_7977e76c-1fe4-4c7d-b34c-f1667d0a747f_0

Approval from authorities does not shield car manufacturers from liability in the Diesel scandal

Insights 19 september 2025

In the CM and DS/Volkswagen AG judgment of 1 August 2025, the European Court of Justice confirmed that car manufacturers cannot escape liability by relying on approvals by competent authorities.

Lees meer
Lindenbaum_Legal 500 comparative guide visual 2025

Lindenbaum writes: the Class Actions Comparative Guide 2025

Insights 14 juli 2025

Our colleagues Damiën Berkhout, Noor Hogerzeil and Dizzy van Duijn have contributed to the Legal 500: Class Actions Comparative Guide 2025. In the country-specific chapter they provide an overview of the class action regime in the Netherlands.

Lees meer
lindenbaum2023_a_hallway_in_a_hotel_with_official_documents_o_1cd0a5c3-bae5-4650-9776-122514ee923f_3

Lowering the bar for disclosure in antitrust damages claims: the AG opinion in the Meliá case

Insights 30 juni 2025

On 12 June 2025, Advocate General Szpunar issued an opinion on the degree of plausibility of a claim that is required under Article 5 of the Antirust Damages Directive for claimants to obtain disclosure of evidence in the context of an antitrust damages action.

Lees meer